Difference (from prior major revision) (author diff)

Changed: 11c11
Motivations beeing at this workshop:
Motivations for being at this workshop:

Issue: Regional Open Space on Open Space Events / Learning Exchange

Convenor: Brian Bainbridge, Michael M Pannwitz

Participants: Ulrika, Kerry, Sheila Isakson, Agneta S., Eva, Martin/Holland?, Antti-Juhani Wihuri, Erich Kolenaty Christa Gescher (responsible for the record)


Summary of the meeting:

Motivations for being at this workshop:

Experiences (not in chronological order):


Follow up:


Online Comments:

1. Accepting the division Global - Regional - Local, I would like to clarify that Regional has many meanings - the "Berlin Region", is different from a "German Region" and from an "European Region".

2. I think that the point about Regional OSonOs? is related with Regonal OSIs. If a regional meeting takes place then a regional OSI is at least informally in place - or can become in place soon.

3. The point about Regional/Local? OSonOS is about geography/distance (that also has an inpact on cost), but also about language. (And probably also about "culture": countries where Catolic religion is dominant are adhering less to OST than the others. As they are normaly Latin speaking countries I don't know exactly what is the cause).

4. Speaking about language (and the Internet), there is today a different emerging way to divide the world, based not on geography but mostly on language. Of course geography still exists. But it can have almost a null impact on OSIs but a greater impact on trans-nacional language-based OSonOS. Tools like Wiki or the OSonline SW would have to be used. But it is not impossible, and it can be an alternative or complement to regional OSonOS.

ArturSilva


I added notes about GlobalChicago:MidwestOS, Singapore and Perth to the notes above. --MichaelHerman